Evidence is the lifeblood of the justice system. It provides the foundation for investigations, prosecutions, and, ultimately, verdicts. And when that evidence can’t be accessed because it’s stored on outdated or incompatible hardware, or worse, goes missing, then the entire case can be compromised. This isn’t just a hypothetical scenario, either—it’s a reality that highlights the challenges of physical evidence storage.
A Dallas murder case emphasized this problem when the lead detective failed to turn over hundreds of pieces of evidence until just before the trial date. The cause behind this was a flawed digital evidence storage method that misplaced 52,000 records from the Dallas Police Department’s database.
Physical storage has long been the norm in evidence management, with evidence scattered across DVDs, memory cards, hard drives, etc. But, with increasing demands on efficiency, security, and accessibility, these methods are now more of a hindrance than a help.
Digital evidence now plays a role in nearly 90% of all crimes. So, transitioning from physical storage to a more advanced, digital solution is crucial for overcoming these challenges.
Two-thirds of law enforcement and legal professionals believe it surpasses physical evidence in case-solving power, yet 48% of police chiefs and agency managers acknowledge their digital transformation strategies are poor or mediocre. There is a clear awareness of the issue and a need for a more sophisticated solution.
Digital evidence management systems offer a centralized, secure, and scalable solution that streamlines the evidence management process. By addressing the limitations of physical storage, these systems safeguard crucial evidence and accelerate the pursuit of justice through timely and accurate investigations.
In this blog, we will explore the specific challenges of physical evidence storage and how DEMS can provide a practical and effective solution.
Current State of Physical Evidence Management
Physical storage devices for evidence have long been the backbone of criminal investigations and court proceedings. However, law enforcement agencies and legal departments are grappling with the growing challenges of physical evidence storage, leading to a mounting crisis in physical evidence management.
The reliance on physical storage media has created a complex and inefficient system. The increasing volume of digital evidence, coupled with the limitations of these formats, has led to a situation where evidence is often scattered, difficult to access, and at risk of loss or compromise. This outdated approach hinders investigations, delays justice, and consumes valuable resources.
The manual, heavily resource-based processes involved in evidence collection, management, and sharing add to the challenges of physical evidence storage. The lack of standardization across agencies has created a fragmented landscape. This makes it difficult to collaborate effectively and share information in a consistent manner.
The disconnected nature of the systems has also been a serious drawback, as police officers need to log into multiple systems at the same time. The constant back-and-forth trips to deliver evidence waste valuable time and resources. The recipients also spend hours manually sorting through these physical evidence storage devices to organize and categorize them on their systems. Also, sharing evidence on loose media is highly insecure and inefficient. The need for a robust and reliable solution is clear, and DEMS are stepping in to fill that gap.
Understanding the Challenges of Physical Evidence Storage
Many law enforcement agencies and legal departments face ongoing physical evidence storage issues. They prove to be significant obstacles in court proceedings and get in the way of timely justice. Some of their major concerns include:
Limited Storage, Limited File Size
One immediate challenge these agencies face that becomes quickly apparent is that DVDs, USB flash drives, and other storage mediums don’t offer unlimited storage. They fill up quickly, requiring another DVD or flash drive to store the remaining case files. It is no wonder that they start piling up fast. This creates fragmentation as evidence gets scattered all over the place. When the situation demands it, you end up spending hours locating it.
Even if storage capacity isn’t a concern, the sheer size of files, especially video evidence, presents significant challenges for physical storage mediums. These formats struggle to hold large files, which leads to the creation of multiple discs or drives. The video evidence is divided into multiple segments and files, stored on separate devices, and reassembled after being received. This is a time-consuming and error-prone process.
Critical Security Threats
Problems with USB and DVDs don’t just stop at storage. Evidence stored on physical media is always vulnerable to theft and unauthorized access. The manual process of hand-delivering these media to different parties increases the likelihood of misplacement, mishandling, or even malicious tampering.
In the world of law, the journey of evidence from discovery to courtroom must be documented. The record must detail every transfer, access, and modification. This is known as chain of custody; every evidence file must have it. With traditional storage media, this process becomes complex. A single case can generate hundreds of discs, making it incredibly difficult to track their movement and integrity. And if the chain of evidence is broken at any point, it can render the evidence inadmissible in court.
Storing and sharing sensitive case information on DVDs and USBs may not be the most reliable approach, as maintaining the integrity of evidence is crucial; without it, the evidence becomes worthless.
Slow and Error-Prone Evidence Collection Process
Physical evidence storage issues often start with how it’s collected. In this digital day and age, you might believe the evidence collection process is easy, with digital evidence automatically ingested from multiple sources by advanced systems. Turns out, the process is actually very manual and time-consuming.
Investigators frequently find themselves making trips to collect evidence, coordinating through emails and phone calls, and completing multiple forms. Accessing evidence often involves navigating multiple systems as well. Once collected, evidence is typically transferred to physical media like DVDs or USBs for storage and sharing purposes. Of course, this is a process that is filled with holes at every step.
Manual Processes Throughout the Evidence Lifecycle
The evidence-handling process is manual and lacks order, consistency, and uniformity. For instance, a prosecutor might receive digital evidence in various formats and at different times because every law enforcement agency uses its preferred method. Some might share evidence images on discs, while other police departments prefer to share them in hard copies, resulting in a lack of standardization.
The current approach to evidence handling needs a significant overhaul. Valuable resources are wasting their crucial time on clerical tasks such as collecting, uploading, downloading, scanning, copying and pasting, organizing, categorizing, tracking, and requesting more evidence. Prosecutors’ offices bear the brunt of this process, having to sort through evidence received in 40 different ways, review it, and then upload it to their system.
Scattered Evidence is Hard to Access and Retrieve
In large-scale investigations, the challenges of physical evidence storage become apparent when thousands of evidence files get spread across hundreds of storage devices. The need to catalogue and track them means the entire case will slow down significantly. It will take a few days to locate the exact video evidence file with the specific scene when the need arises. It will be even harder to find when segments of the video evidence are on multiple discs. When evidence continues to mount, it will eventually topple.
As for access controls, unless the data is encrypted, there will continue to be problems with physical evidence storage. Anyone can access the media device to read, duplicate, or tamper with the information with little reprecussion.
Exposure to Physical Damage and Expensive Backups
Evidence uploaded on USBs, CDs, and DVDs is prone to physical damage, which can lead to data loss. These storage media are at risk from environmental factors such as fire, water damage, wear-and-tear issues, and technical issues like hardware failures or corruption. When such damage occurs, the integrity of the evidence is compromised.
The obvious solution that comes to mind is backing up the data. However, the process is not quite straightforward; it involves transferring the evidence to other storage media, which can be both costly and time-consuming. This repeated transfer process must be conducted regularly to ensure that no data is lost or corrupted, adding to the overall complexity and expense of managing evidence.
High Cost and Maintenance Required
The ongoing influx of cases necessitates a constant supply of physical storage media. This means frequent purchases of USBs, DVDs, and other media to accommodate new evidence. As caseloads grow and evidence files expand, the need for backup storage further escalates costs.
Additionally, ongoing maintenance expenses, including energy consumption, hardware replacements, and regular maintenance checks, can be substantial.
Unaccounted and Lost Evidence
The decentralized nature of physical evidence storage can increase the risk of lost or unaccounted-for items. Physical media is prone to damage, misplacement, and even destruction. When dealing with large volumes of evidence, the likelihood of missing items rises significantly.
For example, consider a scenario where evidence is stored across multiple locations, with different personnel responsible for handling and managing it. In such a decentralized environment, it can be challenging to maintain a comprehensive inventory and ensure that all items are accounted for. This can lead to confusion, delays, and potential loss of crucial evidence.
The consequences of lost evidence can be severe. Missing evidence could compromise a prosecutor’s ability to win a case, leading to wrongful convictions or dismissals.
How DEMS Address the Challenges of Physical Evidence Storage
Challenges of physical evidence storage are creating major roadblocks to delivering timely and accurate justice. The limitations of traditional evidence storage devices are so significant that every stage of the process, from evidence discovery to court admission, is riddled with issues.
This is an era of digital evidence. Storing and sharing critical evidence should be secure, uncomplicated, and straightforward. Problems with physical evidence storage will continue to act as obstacles unless they are replaced by a more secure and centralized system.
Digital evidence management systems speed up investigations by helping agencies efficiently manage large amounts of data. They provide a secure, centralized, cloud-based solution for ingesting, storing, managing, and sharing digital evidence.
Transitioning from physical storage that is scattered across loose media devices to a centralized, encrypted, and organized system enables more efficient management. Let’s explore how digital evidence management systems effectively tackle the challenges mentioned above.
Scalable and Cost-Effective Storage
No more expensive hardware, media replacements, or manual labor. Digital evidence management systems offer cloud-based centralized storage solutions which provide virtually unlimited space. It allows agencies to store vast amounts of evidence without breaking the bank, eliminating the need for constant purchases and maintenance of CDs, DVDs and USBs.
Furthermore, digital evidence management systems offer scalable storage, allowing for the seamless expansion of storage capacity as the volume of evidence grows. This helps put an end to physical evidence storage issues, enabling law enforcement agencies and legal departments to efficiently manage increasing amounts of evidence without incurring outrageous costs.
What’s more, with a digital evidence management system, you can share any number of files, regardless of size, without running into limits. Plus, any action performed on the platform is fully tracked to keep the chain of custody intact, ensuring the evidence is admissible in court.
Secure Evidence Storage and Sharing
Digital evidence management systems make storing and sharing digital evidence easier and way more secure compared to traditional methods like flash drives, DVDs, and hard drives. With everything in one place, there’s less worry about tampering, theft, physical damage, or unauthorized access.
These solutions also use advanced security features like encryption, access controls, location restriction, chain of custody, and tamper detection to keep evidence safe and private. Sharing is simple, too. Only the right people can see or work with the evidence, thanks to role-based access control, SSO, and tokenized URLs. This way, legal processes can run more smoothly and securely, ensuring the integrity of the evidence at all times.
Fast and Easy Access to Evidence
With digital evidence management systems, retrieving evidence can also be incredibly simple. Instead of sifting through stacks of media storage devices, the right evidence file can be swiftly located using advanced search features. For example, if an investigator can’t recall the exact file name or its creation date, a digital evidence management system can search for it by identifying faces, spoken words, and objects in the video. It can even perform multilingual searches or sift through tags and metadata.
Evidence Disaster-Proofing
Transitioning from physical storage to digital storage doesn’t change the fact that environmental factors are still a concern. However, cloud-based digital evidence management systems offer robust disaster recovery options, ensuring that digital evidence is protected from environmental factors such as fires, floods, and other natural disasters or technical issues.
The system automatically backs up and replicates data across multiple locations, minimizing the risk of data loss and ensuring that the evidence can be quickly restored. Unlike the backup-related problems with USB and DVDs, digital evidence management systems offer an automated data recovery option without uploading it manually to backup servers.
You can read more about this in our blog about cloud vs physical evidence storage.
Streamlined Collection of Evidence
Digital evidence management systems solve the problem of officers or investigators having to leave the office to collect the evidence. Evidence can be gathered from different sources in the form of videos, images, documents, emails or more. They can easily ingest evidence from CCTV cameras, body-worn cameras, in-car cameras, or any other form automatically.
To further aid in evidence collection, digital evidence management systems also offer integration with case management software or the agency’s existing systems through custom APIs. This allows digital evidence management systems platform to easily ingest evidence files and store them in digital case folders.
Enhanced Evidence Review and Analysis
Beyond secure and scalable storage, digital evidence management systems also unlock hidden potential within your evidence. The challenges of physical evidence storage are many, but one that is often overlooked is the lack of insights, ease of use, and extra features that they can’t provide.
By leveraging advanced technologies like AI-powered search and automatic transcription and translation, these systems can significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of evidence review and analysis.
AI-powered search capabilities can quickly identify relevant information within large volumes of data, saving investigators valuable time. For example, these systems can search for specific keywords, patterns, or objects within images, videos, or audio files.
Automatic transcription and translation can break down language barriers, making it easier to analyze evidence from diverse sources. This is particularly useful in cases involving non-native speakers or evidence collected in multiple languages.
Improved Collaboration through Standardization
One of the significant benefits of digital evidence management systems is their ability to foster improved collaboration among law enforcement agencies and legal professionals.
For example, digital evidence management systems simplify the discovery process by allowing prosecutors to share evidence securely with defense attorneys through a centralized portal. Instead of physical transfers, evidence can be uploaded and accessed via secure links, streamlining the process. When received, the defense would be able to download, view, or edit depending on the permissions and time limit set by the prosecution.
Standardization in the process comes naturally when police departments and other agencies in the evidence handling process start transitioning from physical storage of evidence to using digital evidence management systems as a collaborative, centralized tool for evidence. This helps speed up the investigative process and streamlines case handling by cutting out delays and unnecessary travelling, making the whole process smooth and efficient.
Integration with Existing Systems
Law enforcement officers often juggle between multiple systems just to access different files, which can be quite frustrating. Digital evidence management systems simplify this by seamlessly integrating with the existing systems. This way, law enforcement personnel can access everything from a single platform, making their work more efficient and less cumbersome.
With a digital evidence management system, every step from discovery to courtroom admission is simplified and streamlined. It facilitates seamless collaboration and efficient evidence transfer by integrating all systems.
As law enforcement and legal agencies face increasing pressure to deliver evidence quickly and resolve cases efficiently, using a digital evidence management system should seamlessly integrate with existing law enforcement and legal technology infrastructure. This ensures a smooth transition and avoids disruptions to workflows. It not only streamlines these manual processes but also provides additional benefits like artificial intelligence and integration with other systems.
Conquer Challenges of Physical Evidence Storage with VIDIZMO DEMS
Burning DVDs or sharing thumb drives can no longer keep up with the rapidly increasing volume of case data. Fortunately, more effective solutions are now available.
VIDIZMO DEMS is an IDC-recognized digital evidence management system that offers a secure AI-powered platform with secure evidence storage, sharing, and analysis capabilities. It can be deployed as SaaS, cloud, on-premises, or hybrid, depending on your agency’s needs.
For organizations transitioning from physical storage to digital storage, VIDIZMO DEMS is the ideal solution. It enables law enforcement and legal professionals to effectively upload, manage, and share the scattered evidence in a standardized manner. It also allows seamless integration through Rest APIs with the existing systems.
The challenges of physical evidence storage have serious implications, and no agency wants to be caught in the middle of the chaos.
Experience how VIDIZMO DEMS can instantly resolve these issues – try it free for 7 days and see the difference for yourself!
People Also Ask
1) What are the challenges of physical evidence storage?
Law enforcement agencies and legal departments often struggle with limited storage space, security risks, and accessibility issues. Moreover, they face environmental threats and the high costs of maintaining evidence on storage devices. Due to physical evidence storage, the entire evidence lifecycle is managed manually, creating significant challenges for these agencies.
2) What is a Digital Evidence Management System (DEMS)?
A Digital Evidence Management System (DEMS) revolutionizes the traditional methods of collecting, analyzing, and sharing evidence. It provides a secure and scalable platform. It handles the entire process of ingesting, storing, managing, analyzing, and securely sharing digital evidence in one central location. Key features include evidence encryption, tamper detection, chain of custody tracking, advanced search capabilities, and role-based access control.
3) What are the benefits of using DEMS for physical evidence storage issues?
DEMS addresses the challenges of physical evidence storage by reducing the need for physical space, enhancing security with encryption and access controls. It speeds up evidence retrieval with advanced search functions and protects evidence from environmental risks through secure backups. These systems also lower costs and improve overall efficiency in managing evidence.
4) Is transitioning from physical storage to a Digital Evidence Management System difficult?
Proper planning and support can effectively manage the transition process. Many DEMS providers, like VIDIZMO, offer tools and services to help organizations seamlessly migrate their existing evidence to a digital platform.
5) Can DEMS store all types of evidence that physical storage devices can?
DEMS can store various types of evidence, like documents, videos, audio files, and images, in a digital format.